On Seeing Hamnet

Maggie O’Farrell’s imagining of Hamlet‘s genesis has been translated into a film of extraordinary passion. Forest witchery so vibrantly portrayed means theatre goers experience the forest’s innumerable life-and-death stories that have imbued Agnes Hathaway’s life with irrefutable power. Shakespeare’s wife, a ghostly presence referred to as Anne in most histories, becomes in O’Farrell’s fiction a match for the Bard in every way. She gathers her healing herbs, tends to her bees, and intuits her falcon’s needs as one who resonates more with the unfolding stories of an ancient forest than with the humans who give her shelter and do their best to “civilize” her. She is an authentic Wild Woman, rich in the ways of the first medicine women, the first growers of food and magic, the first midwives of life and death, the first of those burned and drowned and hanged and tortured to death because of their knowledge and wisdom. With Will, viewers fall under this forest woman’s spell. This, we know, will be a cataclysmic coupling when . . . never if . . . it happens.

For such a couple, grounded in the realities of primal energy, to lose a child is a grief that is untouchable by any of the ordinary-mortal means of mediating loss. No church platitudes comfort. No food fills the emptiness. Not even love can cast its spell and distract from the gaping hole left by their beloved Hamnet. And when Shakespeare, the father, returns to the city, to “work,” Agnes, the mother, feels he is betraying her, their shared grief, and worst of all, their only son.

Their rage expresses mercurially . . . the slamming of a pewter cup upon a wooden table . . . the cold, cold farewells . . . the howls and guttural moans that issue from their souls . . .. None of these grief companions, none, can provide relief for these mythic beings who feel their love and hate and grief too deeply for mortal solace. Will goes to London. To “work.” Agnes remains with her daughters. With their grief. Her brother listens to her anguished mutterings but cannot lessen her terrible sorrow. She lives with the death of a precious child the way a soldier lives with a missing arm – always expecting to see the limb where it should be, beloved, whole.

And then she learns her mate, William Shakespeare, has written a tragedy, not the comedy she feared he uses to distract himself from her bottomless well of suffering. She insists on seeing what he has been doing while she has been with their remaining children, loving and hating, searching for the antidote to their horrifying loss. Finding none.

The name of tragedy Will has been writing, Hamlet, shocks her into wonder. The names Hamlet and Hamnet are interchangeable. She bows her head, pulsing with the discovery that he has been expressing his grief about their child and not distracting himself with frivolous comedy. In this moment, she can never imagine laughing again.

Initially, standing in the pit so close to the stage she can almost touch the actors, she is outraged when they speak her son’s name, cries for them to take the word Hamlet from their mouths. And then, with an understanding that settles in like a warming fire, she knows the theatre is the place that is her husband’s forest, his source of power, his only source of comfort. It is the place Will waits, as she waits in the forest, for their beloved Hamnet to return.

The Play’s the Thing, always, with Shakespeare. The unbearable suffering of a young prince given an impossible task by an insubstantial ghost calms the mother who has lost her child. She listens to the actors’ speeches. She watches their faces. And, at last, she is comforted by the elixir of confession, inner torment, loss . . . and all that is unknowable within the world of the play. Bodies fall to rage and justice. Blood flows. The world comes right again, is restored after the worst has happened.

At the end, Prince Hamlet dies. The ghost her husband became when Hamnet died is flesh and blood, the man, the mate she can weep and howl and perhaps even laugh with once more. This play is his raging grief. It matches her own. Hamnet, the lovely boy their passion for one another sparked into life, is laid to rest in an Earth that knows how to take to itself wild creatures, whether human or no.

We, their witnesses, know love, joy, and peace will return to their family, tinged always with the deepest blue of those graves where each of our loved ones lie buried, whether in the ground or in our hearts. This is how life goes on after tragedy. Someone tells a story. Someone hears a story. Someone, after an endless night, sees a lighter sky and the wonder and promise of a sunrise.

Until next time,

Jane

On Creativity

The human journey, on every continent and in every age, presents human beings with the contrasting experiences of pain and pleasure, joy and sorrow, kindness and cruelty. It is widely believed that when we are children, we are so pliant and so teachable that many religious and educational practices use these contrasting life and death forces to instil their belief systems, claiming:

“Give me a child until he is seven and I’ll show you the man . . ..”

This saying is sometimes attributed to Aristotle, sometimes to Saint Ignatius Loyola, founder of the Jesuits, and sometimes to self-appointed gurus who claim to be its source because they do not bother to research their materials or even know that they should. In these days of technological glamours, “likes” trump everything, especially the search for truth.

Even if we can never be sure of the quote’s source, we can identify its English language pronoun and noun. He, the pronoun, stands for children born with male genitalia, and man, the noun, is the name we use to describe the adult phase of that view of maleness.

Whenever  I think about that sentence’s male-centredness, I also think about what happened to those designated “girls” and “women” while boys were being educated formally, in schools and churches, to become “men.”

Because of writers like Mary Wollstonecraft and her daughter, Mary Shelley, because of the Bronte sisters, Anne, Emily, and Charlotte, and because of Jane Austen, here in the west we learn in our elementary and high-school English classes that girls and women were being domesticated, trained to serve, schooled to care for their fathers and brothers and husbands, molded to obediently meet the needs of home and hearth as the “Angel in the House,” certainly, but most especially, they were groomed to meet the needs of the boys and men they lived among.

I don’t believe I could write the above sentence without knowing that while others did their best to control and subjugate girls and women, Nature Herself taught us how to live within such strictures with more pleasure than pain. All we have to do is align ourselves with Her first principle: Creativity. This is not to say that creativity should replace the fight for equality for all peoples. Nor do I mean to suggest that making something can make up for the harm done by inequality. What I am saying is that Creativity makes the fight for equality more bearable because it feeds us at a fundamentally primal level. More than any other support, we need our primal energies to keep on keeping on.

Then as now, Creativity is an unstoppable source of energy that draws in the marginalized to the centre of Life. Creativity bolsters our commitment to causes; it is the impulse to make, MAKE, unshackled by the belief that we have no right to do so.

If we are lucky, whether we’re born with male or female parts, some combination of the two, or their absence entirely, we learn to harness the brutish nonsense that does its best to convince us we are less than. When we learn to harness the energies fueling limitations and use them to support our own purposes, we become makers of every sort. And, once we have had a creative, making experience, there is no going back. Madness and rage may descend for a time, but then a friend says, “Come to pottery class with me.”

Creativity is the finger in the dyke of madness.

Creativity says, “Forget labels and body parts, religious edicts and educational gridlock. Just make something . . . with your mind and heart and body and spirit . . ., a story . . ., a pot . . ., a dress . . ., an invitation to others to create. Make something that restores your belief in yourself and your cause, because Mistress Creativity assures us with every making adventure we undertake, “In My company, all is well, communities form, and peace reclaims the human soul.”

Whatever pronoun you choose, whatever your experiences before your seventh birthday, make something today and share it as you will.

And then, use the joy it brings to view your current challenges anew.

Until next time,

Jane